ADPAN URGES JAPAN FEDERATION OF BAR ASSOCIATION(JFBA) MEMBERS TO TAKE A STRONG CLEAR STANCE FOR THE ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY

adpan_logo_cmyk_small4.jpg 

Media Statement – 5/10/2016

ADPAN URGES JAPAN FEDERATION OF BAR ASSOCIATION(JFBA) MEMBERS TO TAKE A STRONG CLEAR STANCE FOR THE ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY

ADPAN (The Anti Death Penalty Asia-Pacific Network)  is pleased that members of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, whose membership includes 37,000 lawyers and hundreds of other legal professionals,  will be voting for the abolition of the death penalty at their Annual General Meeting on 7/10/2016 (The Japan Times and The Guardian, 21/9/2016). We hope that this Resolution and/or Declaration will be approved with an overwhelming majority, if not unanimously.

The Malaysian Bar, whose membership now is about 17,000 practicing lawyers in Peninsular Malaysia, adopted a Resolution in March 2006 at its Annual General Meeting calling for the abolition of the death penalty, and for a moratorium on execution pending abolition. Since then, resolutions for the abolition of the death penalty have been tabled and adopted by the Malaysian Bar over the years re-affirming its membership’s commitment towards the abolition of the death penalty.

A resolution of a Bar Associations, adopted by its membership, is a very powerful statement which demonstrates clearly that it is not just the Bar, but that its members are  also  clearly for the abolition of the death penalty.

This JFBA resolution and/or declaration of members will be a strong statement to the Japanese Government, now led by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who has sadly executed about 16 persons since 2012. There are presently about 124 inmates on death row in Japan.

The risk of miscarriage of justice, and innocent people being executed became a major concern since 2014 after Iwao Hakamada was released having spent more than 45 years on death row. He had been  sentenced to hang in 1968 for the murders two years earlier of a company president, his wife and their two children. The presiding judge, Hiroaki Murayama, when releasing Hakamada in 2014 also had this to say, “There is a possibility that [key pieces of] evidence have been fabricated by investigative bodies.

ADPAN  calls on  the Japanese government to heed the call of JFBA and its members , and  abolish the death penalty.

ADPAN also hopes that Bar associations, civil society organisations, political parties, trade unions and groups  in Asia-Pacific nation states will also pass similar resolutions at General Meetings calling for the abolition of the death penalty.

Charles Hector

Fifa Rahman

 

For and on behalf of ADPAN

 

 

The Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (ADPAN) is a regional network of organization and individual members committed to working for the abolition of the death penalty in Asia-Pacific

Website: https://adpan.org/aboutus/

Email: contactadpan@gmail.com

Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/ADPANetwork

Twitter: @adpanetwork

 

 

Mongolia is officially free from the death penalty

It is to our great relief that Mongolia has now officially abolished the death penalty all together.

Mongolia’s lawmakers voted in favour of a new Criminal Code that abolishes the death penalty for all crimes when it comes into effect in September next year.

read the stories on the long road to death penalty abolition in Mongolia here.

China: Supreme Court overturns death sentence of woman who killed violent husband

Li Yan, who killed her husband after suffering months of domestic violence, has had her death sentence overturned by China's Supreme People's Court.Li Yan, who killed her husband after suffering months of domestic violence, has had her death sentence overturned by China’s Supreme People’s Court.

© Private

Justice was never going to be served by executing Li Yan. Her case has shone a spotlight on the need for the Chinese authorities to do more to prevent violence against women.

William Nee, China Researcher at Amnesty International
Tue, 24/06/2014

The decision by China’s Supreme People’s Court to overturn the death sentence of a woman convicted of killing her husband after suffering months of domestic abuse, highlights the urgent need for the authorities to do more to prevent violence against women, said Amnesty International.

Li Yan, 43, from Sichuan province in Southwest China was sentenced to death in August 2011 for the murder of her abusive husband, Tan Yong, in late 2010. Li Yan’s brother received news that the Supreme Court sent the case back to the Sichuan Provincial High People’s Court for a retrial in May.

“Justice was never going to be served by executing Li Yan. The decision by the Supreme Court to overturn her death sentence is significant and the right course of action,” said William Nee, China Researcher at Amnesty International.

“Li’s case has shone a spotlight on the need for the Chinese authorities to do more to prevent violence against women. They are obliged to properly investigate all such claims of abuse and prosecute those responsible. Had the authorities protected Li, as they are required to under international law, this tragic outcome could have been avoided.”

The prolonged violence Li suffered at the hands of her husband began not long after the couple were married in early 2009. Tan frequently beat and brutalized his wife. He cut off one of her fingers, stubbed cigarettes out on her face and during the freezing Sichuan winters locked her outside on the balcony of their apartment for several hours with little clothing.

China’s record on preventing violence against women is due to be reviewed by a UN panel later this year. In the last review in 2006, China was criticized for the lack of comprehensive national legislation to address violence against women.

Li contacted the authorities, including the police, on several occasions to seek protection and required hospital treatment after one attack. The police took pictures of Li’s injuries after one beating but no action was taken.

“Any retrial must fully consider the evidence of the sustained abuse Li suffered, which was overlooked during the first trial. The Court must not impose the death sentence this time,” said William Nee.

Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the nature of the crime, the characteristics of the offender or the method used by the state to carry out the execution.

3 days workshop on “2nd Abolitionists Asia Workshop on Death Penalty”

 

 3 days workshop on “2nd Abolitionists Asia Workshop

on Death Penalty”

20-22nd June 2014, LLG Cultural Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

UPDATE DAY 1:

ADPAN together with LLG Cultural foundation, SUARAM,  Amnesty International (Malaysia) and Civil Rights committee of Kl/Selangor Chinese Assembly hall organising 3 days workshop on “2nd Abolitionists Asia Workshop on Death Penalty” from 20th  June to 22nd June 2014 at LLG Office in Kuala Lumpur. The workshop will be focusing on Malaysia, Singapore and other countries in this region as well as to plan for future actions to campaign against death penalty. 3 days workshop just started with introduction of participants from Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong. The workshop was started with welcoming speech by Liow Kok Fah, Chairman of CRC. After that, Miss Ngeow Chow Ying from ADPAN presented a case study on Cheong Chun Yin, a Malaysian facing death penalty in Singapore because of drug offences . According to his story, he was cheated by his own friend by asking him to bring drugs from Cambodia and he wasnt aware of it until he was arrested. This story is similar to many others who are facing death penalty or death in row.

 

We also had sharing session with colleagues from Malaysia and Singapore on death penalty in these two countries-  what are the issues and challenges.Gwen from Amnesty International (Malaysia) presented overview on death penalty situation  in Malaysia and challenges facing by Malaysian Civil Societies.  Meanwhile Priscilia and Damien from, Second Chances of Singapore also shared situation in Singapore and whether the amendments to the law on death penalty are making any differences or not and whether the implementation is genuinely taking place in Singapore.

 

(Gwen, Amnesty International)                   (Priscilla and Damien, Second Chances)

 

From the both presentation on Malaysia and Singapore there are few similarities between the countries could be seen in implementation of death penalty, which as below:
– Lack of judicial protection under the law
– Lack of data and statistics
– Lack of political will from the Government’s
– Lack in investigation process and to get the the actual offenders (exp: Drug offences or murder)
– Substantive assistance (to help investigations) no transparency and sometimes in bad faith

The first day ended with questions and answers to both countries presenters and a group photo with all the participants. The updates of day two and day three will updated in Blog as well as in facebook (https://www.facebook.com/ADPANetwork)

 

Yong Vui Kong’s lawyer and ADPAN Member, M. Ravi, talks to Malaysia’s BFM radio station

Ravi

On 19 November 2013, Yong Vui Kong’s lawyer and ADPAN Member, M. Ravi, talked to Malaysia’s BFM radio station about the recent changes in the law to the mandatory death penalty in Singapore and the implications on his client Yong Vui Kong who had his death sentence commuted on 14 November. See blog post here.

Ravi highlighted the concern around another young Malaysian, Cheong Chun Yin, who still faces execution in Singapore. Cheong, who is now at the final stage of appeal, was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death in Singapore in February 2010.

Listen:

%d bloggers like this: